The Power of Persuasion: How We're Bought and Sold - by Robert Levine
Date read: 201-03-05How strongly I recommend it: 8/10
(See my list of 150+ books, for more.)
Go to the Amazon page for details and reviews.
Details into how advertising and sales can influence your decision-making abilities and ways to watch out of being negatively persuaded.
Contents:
- TYPES OF PERSUASION
- TYPE OF PERSUASION - AUTHORITY
- TYPE OF PERSUASION - HONESTY
- TYPE OF PERSUASION - LIKEABILITY
- THE CONTRAST PRINCIPLE
- PERSUASION AND MATH
- COMPLEXITY
- ESCALATING COMMITMENTS
- PERPETUAL PERSUASION
- ADVICE ON HOW TO DEFEND AGAINST PERSUASION
My Notes
The psychology of persuasion emanates from three directions: the characteristics of the source, the mind-set of the target person, and the psychological context within which the communication takes place. Think of it as them, you, and the between. Any or all of the three can tilt the power balance either toward or against you. If the latter occurs, you're vulnerable.
Studies have shown that people generally approach the threats of life with the philosophy that bad things are more likely to happen to other people than to themselves.
If we can convince ourselves we're immune to natural events like disease and earthquakes, it should be no surprise we also believe ourselves capable of controlling mere psychological forces like social influence and persuasion.
Situation - the particulars of the time, the place, and the social context - are often better predictors of how people will act than is the type of person they are.
Effective salespeople I've encountered in my research, it's that they almost never look like "real" salespeople. They have the ability to first set you at ease about their motives, then they sell.
Three characteristics are related to persuasiveness: perceived authority, honesty, and likability. When someone has any or all of these characteristics, we're not only more willing to agree to that person's request, willing to do so without carefully considering the facts.
Researchers demonstrated that whether a child cheated in one situation was a poor predictor of whether he'd cheat in an even slightly different one.
Because moral trustworthiness is perceived as relatively unwavering, a little of it goes a long way.
Once the halo is attached, we do our best to ignore and explain away indiscretions that might compromise our impression. However, a good reputation is less durable than a bad one. Good reputations are difficult to acquire but easy to lose. Bad reputations are easy to acquire and difficult to lose.
Another route to believability is to disguise propaganda as objective information. Communicators who present both sides of an argument - both for and against their agenda-are perceived as less partial and more trustworthy.
Kissinger liked to say that his solution was to always present three or four choices to Nixon, but to "color the choices" and frame them so his own preference always stood out as the best.
The best way to overcome objections is to address them before they occur. When someone says, "You're not going to believe this," he's trying to defuse your disbelief in what he's about to say. If someone says, "This may sound silly," it establishes license to say something silly.
Mavens: (1) know a lot of people; (2) communicate a great deal with people; (3) are more likely than others to be asked for their opinions; and (4) enjoy spreading the word about what they know and think.
Reciprocity can be a dictatorial force. But avoid creating an obligation that's too burdensome for their target to repay. For example, employers sometimes give substantial raises to workers with the intention of reinforcing their hard work and motivating them to work even harder. Studies show that if the raise is large enough, it does activate a brief feeling of obligation to please the employer. In the long run, however, it rarely leads to more output. Instead, it encourages the workers to rationalize why they deserve the raise. They might, for example, tell themselves that their job is more difficult than they'd previously thought, or dwell on how little they'd been paid in the past. As a result, if the raise is too steep, and the justification leak isn't plugged, the initial favor can backfire. The persuader may create new standards of entitlement, subsequent disgruntlement, and, ultimately, lower production than before.
Gifts of time are less transparent and more readily accepted than tangible commodities. The reciprocity pressure is a function of the perceived value of the other's time.
"Good cop-bad cop" routine is most effective with women, teenagers, and timid men.
Reciprocity-of-liking rule: when people like us, we're inclined to like them back.
Chronic "Creditor": individuals who thrive on having others indebted to them. Much or their lives are spent on the twin tasks of assembling indebtedness from others and avoiding being in debt themselves.
Six characteristics that define the creditor type:
The closer the kinship between the person giving a gift and the one receiving it, the less scrupulously the reciprocity rule was enforced.
The most fundamental of context effects is the principle of contrast. The principle relies on the fact that human minds magnify differences:
When two relatively similar stimuli are placed next to each other, they'll be perceived as more different from each other than they actually are.
How we respond to a person or a request - whether it seems reasonable or excessive, important or trivial - depends on what came before and what other information sits beside it in the picture.
In persuasion, contrast gets exploited in at least two ways: 1)To convince you that what a company is selling is a better deal than what the competition has to offer and 2)To alter your expectations, or what's known as your "anchor point."
Anchor points are remarkably malleable.
"There is a test we used to do in class to see how easily living things can adapt. You put a frog in a pail of water and gradually turn up the heat. The frog just keeps adjusting to the new temperature, until it finally boils to death, because it is so used to adjusting that it doesn't think to jump out of the pail. I feel like that frog."
Three traps to watch out for:
Persuasion artists understand that in the buyer's mind, the value of an absolute number is arbitrary, ambiguous, and malleable and that as a result, consumers can be easily induced to pay more or less for the same product.
Ten rules of framing that salespeople may exploit you with:
To define your own criteria of fiscal sensibility, I suggest a two-question self-test: 1) Is it a good value NOW? and 2) Is it worth the cost to YOU?
Too many choices can be overwhelming which leads to a desire for simplicity. Unfortunately, this can become an invitation for exploitation.
Six situations to watch out for:
We react to just a single, isolated piece of information. In persuasion, this can be a very dangerous shortcut. It exposes what's known in sales vernacular as the hot button.
This method of cornering the customer is called the "Four Walls" technique. You're asked multiple rhetorical questions (classically, four) that wall you in, forcing the inescapable conclusion that you have no justification for not purchasing this product.
Some techniques bring a paradoxical approach to the escalation sequence by pushing a request to or beyond its acceptable limit and then backing off.
A door in the face method (aka "the reject-then-compromise-procedure") - The salesperson begins with a large request he expects will be rejected. He wants the door to be slammed in his face. Looking forlorn, he now follows this with a smaller request that, unknown to the customer, was his target all along. It activates the contrast effect and sets up the norm of reciprocity. "I've made this concession to you," the salesperson implies. "It's your turn to give something in return."
"And that's not all!" technique - Begins with the salesperson asking a high price. This is followed by a several-second pause, during which the customer is kept from responding. The salesperson then offers a better deal by either lowering the price or adding a bonus product.
The insidiousness of slowly escalating commitments is they put you in situations that catch you off guard. You don't recognize the
sum total of your actions until after the fact, by which time it may well be too late.
Warren Buffett: "When you find yourself in a hole, the best thing you can do is stop digging." Practice saying, "I made a mistake." Or: "I was wrong. Thanks for the learning experience."
Eight general principles are good basic guides for what to watch out for:
Sometimes people need more aggressive and specific intervention. Here are some techniques that have proved effective:
Becoming a good critical thinker. Here are a few faculties you might work on:
An eight-step decision-making strategy developed by cognitive psychologists known by the acronym of PROACT (problem, objectives, alternatives, consequences, and trade-offs):
PR - Clearly define your problem. What is it you're trying to decide?
O - Specify your objectives. Think through where you want this decision to take you.
A - Force yourself to consider alternative courses of action.
C - Evaluate the consequences of all possible decisions. Be imaginative here.
T - What are the trade-offs of each course of action? List the pros and cons of potential choices. Address uncertainties. What could happen in the future, how likely is it to occur, and how will it effect your decision? What is your risk tolerance? Plan ahead. How may this decision affect other decisions you make in the future?
Beware of exploitive professionals who frame their requests in misleading ways. Be especially on guard when they play to your fear of danger and loss. It's best if you can physically remove yourself from the context. When this isn't possible, try to remove yourself psychologically. Learn to watch yourself as an outsider would, from as detached a distance as you can.
Find a person to play devil's advocate and when seeking advice from others, be careful not to lead them on.